California Educator

June/July 2023

Issue link: http://educator.cta.org/i/1500904

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 29 of 59

"If you find yourself at the center of one of these controversies, there are many strategies that can help with avoiding negative outcomes." CTA helps protect members and students while countering attacks against public education By Theresa Witherspoon Push Back, Fight Back M O R E A N D M O R E , educators are at the center of current political attacks on public education, whether it be for supporting and keeping LGBTQ+ students safe or ensuring that students receive an education that accurately reflects our nation's complex history and promotes their critical thinking skills. Even in Cali- fornia where we have strong laws and governmental entities that support honest and culturally responsive education, our members are being misrepresented and blamed for inaccurate accounts of their efforts. ese attacks are popping up in various forms, such as: • In Chico, a parent represented by the "Center for Amer- ican Liberty" has sued the district for failing to report to her that her child had briefly used a different name and pronoun at school. e district has a policy con- sistent with California Department of Education (CDE) guidance that states if a student does not want their parent/guardian to know they are using a different gen- der identity at school, the school shall not inform the parent/guardian over the student's objection. A CTA member who had appropriately supported the student has been caught up in the litigation and had her name used in the media. • In Clovis, the district has flouted the CDE guidance on this issue and is requiring employees to inform parents if they are supporting students with respect to their gen- der identity; and if the student objects, the student will not be able to receive this support. • Also in Clovis, a teacher who has for years had a rain- bow pride flag up in his classroom was directed to take it down because it allegedly violates the district's policy regarding personal items that reflect "controversial issues." No one ever complained about the flag and, in fact, numerous students had thanked the teacher for it over the years. • In Paso Robles, the district adopted a resolution ban- ning certain concepts related to racism and the role of slavery in our country's history, resulting in a broad era- sure of historical events and essential concepts from the curriculum that are necessary to understand and learn about U.S. society and racial justice. • In Temecula Valley, the school board passed a resolu- tion aimed at "Critical Race eory" which prohibits teachers from instructing on concepts such as racism existing in our society or that the preservation of slavery had any influence on our country's move for independence from England. • roughout California, Public Records Act requests have been used to identify individuals engaged in equity education. In some instances, those teachers have then been targeted for harassment, either through social media or in mainstream media. • In Glendale, a candidate for local office requested docu- ments from the district related to LGTBQ+ curriculum. e records included emails that identified a teacher who had shown a gay pride video. e teacher was subsequently doxxed, placed under investigation, and subjected to death threats on her home voicemail. • In San Ramon Valley, teachers who ran their schools' 28 cta.org Advocacy Legal Beat

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of California Educator - June/July 2023