California Educator

February / March 2018

Issue link: http://educator.cta.org/i/939681

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 13 of 67

Hunger and Test Performance A N Y T E A C H E R can tell you there is a rela- tionship between poor nutrition and poor student performance. Children just can't think when they don't have food in their stomachs. Now new evidence shows a connection between a lack of nutrition at home and poor performance on mathematics tests. In a study released in 2017, researchers found a link between poor test perfor- mance and the time of month in which a family 's food stamps from the federal Sup- plemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) run low. The study was based on student performance in South Carolina. But University of Wisconsin economics professor Chad Cotti says results may be generalized to other loca- tions because "regardless of the state, households receive all of their SNAP assistance on one given day." Cotti notes that there is a time near the end of an existing SNAP cycle (such as the week before receipt of the next month's SNAP dol- lars) when children in a SNAP household are in a relatively lower caloric state. "Our results indicate that during this period academic performance is reduced." What is not clear is whether poor per- formance is from lack of food or reaction to stress in the household because food is running out. Now that research has been established, however, solutions are being considered. One possibility: Distribute food stamps twice a month — as long as there are not unin- tended consequences of students being hungry twice a month rather than once. Read the study at tinyurl.com/SNAPstudy . —Dina Martin H U N G R Y S T U D E N T S 12 cta.org In the Know N E W S & N O T E S

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of California Educator - February / March 2018